The radioactivity discharge accident that the Fukushima nuclear plant of Tokyo Electric Power Company starts the worst in the history of mankind division was caused. As a result, a large amount of radioactive substance is discharged, the serious atmosphere, the soil, the water quality, and seawater pollution are generated, and the crucial influence is caused in the citizens life and the primary industry seriously.
The tone of argument that attacks this as "Harmful rumor" is formed to the action of the consumer who watches the agriculture, forestry and fisheries thing polluted with the radioactivity with the mass garbage.
Farm products that farmer is made every effort, included, and made hard. The distributor and some consumers have people who try to sell and to buy the agriculture, forestry and fisheries things produced in Fukushima and Ibaraki positively. These people try to support the stricken area hard by positively selling, and buying the agriculture, forestry and fisheries thing in the region polluted with the radioactivity. Such a support service is expected to extend.
Public relations in such a context are positively developed.
This is a propaganda that attacks the distributor and the consumer who shows the security posture to the agriculture, forestry and fisheries thing polluted by the radioactivity in indirect shape.
It is assumed that it is an aim to stencil the impression that it is a hostile behavior to the stricken area the possession of the security posture for the product polluted by the radioactivity.
It is aimed that the image that it is non-human correspondence the possession of the security posture for the intake of the food polluted by the radioactivity without the mind of sympathy to the producer in the stricken area is formed.
However, is it too inhumane with sense of vigilance by calmly thinking for the food polluted by the radioactivity?
It has the mind of consideration for the producer who receives damage by the consumer who doesn't reside in the stricken area and has received a serious blow, and posture in which it tries to do the support that I can do is the praised one. The mind to love brothers left in a severe phase is honorable.
However, it is not proper to induce the impression operation such as the bad man the consumer who shows a strong security posture to the product polluted by the radioactivity, and cold-blooded man it by misusing this diagram.
Assailant = twicer who is afflicting this agriculture, forestry and fisheries trader is drawn the agriculture, forestry and fisheries trader as a victim by the feature of this diagram, and exists in the drawn point when the consumer shows the security posture to the product polluted by the radioactivity.
It is a producer, a consumer of farm products that appears in this drama, and is classified the consumer into two further. Consumer A is the good-natured citizens of a warm mind that wins the desire and takes the stricken area product positively in producer's painful fact. On the other hand, consumer B is the citizens who have severe sense of vigilance for the radiation poisoning food, and in this drama, it is drawn as cold-blooded man who lacks the mind of sympathy to the producer in the stricken area. Only three people (producer, consumer A, and consumer B) appear in this drama.
When it is inhumane and the action is egocentric, the action that shows sense of vigilance to the food of the radiation poisoning will be located by the diagram of this drama being stenciled. The action that watches the radiation poisoning food is induced assumption as inhumane and an egocentric action, and self-imposed control before long. Because of this is aim and expectation
To overlook and not to become it are to hide the appearance of a true assailant secretly by this diagram.
No assailant consumer B who watches the radiation poisoning food has the truth. It is a similar producer, and consumer B is a victim.
A true assailant is a person concerned who causes the radioactivity discharge accident.
This accident occurred by having neglected the most fundamental security precaution and it is necessary to ask the responsibility of the person concerned of the accident generation severely in this accident.
This nuclear accident was caused by the tsunami as pointed out repeating by this blog. It is guessed that the tsunami was the one of a similar scale to 1870 land earthquake tsunami generated in 1896.
The tsunami generated 115 years ago should be called a recent tsunami generation case, that is, think in the genealogy such as the large earthquakes. The first security precaution that constructs the nuclear plant in Japan is an earthquake and the tsunami measures. The tsunami measures are the correspondence items of top priority and the principal emphasis.
However, it did not have 1870 land earthquake tsunami level to the tsunami in the first nuclear power plant in Fukushima. A serious accident occurred for that.
I cannot help saying that this accident is 100% man-made disaster if this fact is based. This doesn't pass though president Shimizu of Tokyo Electric Power Company showed the opinion that can be received even if it is made remarks that it followed the standard of the tsunami countermeasure in the country, and denies the responsibility of Tokyo Electric Power Company.
It is natural to take the security precaution of thorough as an entrepreneur, and not having corresponded to the tsunami scale 115 years ago is a serious misconduct that should be asked the responsibility. It is not proper to impute the responsibility to the country.
However, it is necessary to ask an equal responsibility with the entrepreneur naturally in the meaning that has allowed the country for 1870 land earthquake tsunami scale not to respond to the tsunami either.
Both the agriculture and forestry fishery producer and the consumer are the person concerned in an important thing the assailant of a series of disaster who causes the nuclear accident, and victims.
Compelling the intake of the agriculture and forestry fishery product in the polluted radioactive area to the consumer imputes the responsibility that the nuclear accident generation person should originally assume to the consumer.
If the consumer buys, and takes the agriculture and forestry fishery product in the vicinity of the nuclear power plant, the onus of damage in the electric power company and the country can be reduced.
Do not let us be taken in this diagram though the diagram assumed that the producer is a victim, and the consumer who watches the radioactivity an assailant is intentionally circulated with the mass garbage.
The diagram of the truth is a country where the assailant caused the nuclear accident, an entrepreneur, and both agriculture and forestry fishery producers and consumer are victim. The country should make amends for agriculture and forestry fishery producer's [**ru] damage by 100% taking the responsibility with the nuclear power plant entrepreneur.
The product of the stricken area need not be forcibly taken though the consumer holds big uneasiness if the government makes amends for agriculture and forestry fishery producer's [**ru] damage with the entrepreneur by 100%.
As for the denunciation of the consumer behavior that values safety without asking the responsibility of the accident generation, the crick is also extreme though the safety standard need not be disregarded, and an excessive precaution be done.
It is a fundamental mistake to attack the consumer who watches the radioactivity without asking the responsibility in the entrepreneur and the country that assumes the responsibility to the accident. Propaganda and the information control that imputes country and entrepreneur's responsibilities to the consumer must not let it being made dance.
